• About US & Thistle Dew Books
  • Book Shoppe
  • COPYRIGHT NOTICE
  • Emporium
  • Farm Photos
  • Historic Interpretation
  • List of Articles on TheHistoricFoodie’s Blog
  • Motorcycles are Everywhere, Please Drive Safely©
  • PROGRAMS, DEMONSTRATIONS & LECTURES: Martin and Vickie Can Provide

Thehistoricfoodie's Blog

~ An enjoyable ramble through the world of Historic Foods and Cooking to include Gardening History, Poultry History, Dress, and All Manner of Material Culture.[©]

Thehistoricfoodie's Blog

Monthly Archives: November 2011

Whitewashed Walls in Colonial America©

16 Wednesday Nov 2011

Posted by thehistoricfoodie in 18th century cooking, Colonial foods, historic food, open hearth cooking

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

18th century kitchen, whitewash

While doing an 18th century demonstration recently, several people asked how the walls in the fort were painted.  That seems a reasonable question so that is the topic of today’s post. 

Ft. Toulouse

There were multiple reasons for whitewashing, or lime-washing interior walls, the primary one being to lighten the room making it easier to see in the wee small hours.  By lightening an interior, the structure appeared larger and roomier than when dark and drab. 

Whitewash was thought to deter vermin of various sorts, another important consideration, for even before the nature of common germs was known, some found the presence of roaches, flies, ants, mice, and other pests annoying. 

Whitewashing the outside of a building or fence sealed the wood and protected it from the elements.  Even stone walls and structures were thought to benefit from being whitewashed as it sealed minute cracks and crevices and protected them from moisture and temperature extremes. Reducing the amount of moisture on the stones helped eliminate mildew and musty odor.  – Eberlein, Harold Donaldson.  The Architecture of Colonial America.  1915.  Boston.

Ft. Toulouse, 2011

 

There were those who thought whitewashing a building or roof rendered it incombustible, a theory first put forth in the medieval era when wooden houses were ordered to be whitewashed in an effort to prevent the grand fires that often destroyed major portions of European cities.  – The Cultivator.  Vol. 2.  – New York State Agricultural Society. 

The ingredients in whitewash changed little through the 19th century, the common mixture being unslacked lime and water with salt added to keep the material from peeling off of the painted surfaces.  The whitewash was sometimes thinned with milk, but whitewash differed from milk paint.  Sizing could be used instead of salt to render the whitewash impervious to water, and later in the 19th century white vitriol (sulfate of zinc) was used.  – Mechanics Magazine.  Vol. 6.  Oct. 7, 1826. 

To clean and brighten interior walls or ceilings that had been blackened by smoke from a fireplace, multiple books recommended adding a little indigo squeezed through a bag to the mixture.

My distinguised visitors, Michael & Annabelle

Various materials were added to whitewash to add color, such as Prussian blue, iron oxide, animal blood, yellow ochre, sienna, chrome yellow, verdigris, vermilion, Venetian red, etc.  – Lea, Elizabeth E.  Domestic Cookery, Useful Receipts, and Hints to Young Housekeepers.  1859.  Baltimore.  & Tegg, Thomas.  Tegg’s Handbook for Emigrants.  1839.  London.

To Mix Whitewash.  Pour a kettle of boiling water on a peck of unslacked lime; put in 2 lbs. whiting*, and half a pint of salt; when all are mixed together put in ½ ounce of Prussian blue, finely powdered; add water to make it a proper thickness to put on a wall. 

Records state that as early as the thirteenth century the practice of whitewashing buildings was common, even the interiors of churches were whitewashed.  Extant notes from Henry VIII instruct whitewashing the Norman Chapel in the Tower and many other areas.  Westminster Hall was whitewashed for the coronation of Edward I.  – Notes and Queries.  March 25, 1854. & Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle Upon Tyne.  & Archaeologia Aeliana, or, Miscellaneous Tracts Relating to Antiquity. 

Whitewash was common by 1715 in the U.S. when William Barry documented the practice of whitewashing interiors by recording an agreement between a workman and a church in which the former was to whitewash the ceiling and walls of a meeting house in Farmingham, Mass.  – Barry, William.  A History of Farmingham, Massachusetts:  Including the Plantation from 1640 to the Present Time.  1847.  Boston.

Whitewashed walls were often stenciled in distemper paint in Colonial America.  Ann Eckert Brown wrote that a common color scheme was white, black, and red with the black and red applied over the whitewashed surfaces.  – Brown, Ann Eckert.  American Wall Stencilling, 1790-1840.  2003.  University Press of New England.

Durable Whitewash.  I am enabled to certify the efficacy of marine salt in fixing whitewash made of lime.  In the year 1795, when I was director of the naval artillery at the port of Toulon, I was commissioned to ascertain the utility of a method proposed by the master painter of that port, M. Maquilan, for whitewashing the ships between deck, and likewise their holds, in a durable manner, by means of lime.  Our report was in favour of this process, which consists in saturating water in which the lime is slacked with muriate of soda, (common salt.)  The whitewash produced by it is very permanent, does not crack, nor come off upon one’s hands or clothes.  The experiment was made only on wood.  It appears from M. St. Bernarde’s account, that it succeeded equally well on walls.  – Smith, Robert.  The Friend.  June 7, 1835. 

Men are men, and not all men of earlier centuries wanted to be bothered with something as mundane as whitewashing.  Lucky for them, the whitewasher usually made his rounds in the spring with his bucket and long-handled brush making his presence known to housewives by crying: 

“Y’ere’s the White Whitey-Wash!

Brown Whitey-Wash!

Yellow Whitey-Wash!

Green Whitey-Wash!

Wash. Wash!

I’m about.

Bib:   City Cries.  George S. Appleton, publisher.  1850.  NY.

The Southern Agriculturist and Register of Rural Affairs.  Vol. 10.  1837. 

Urban, Sylvanus.  The Gentleman’s Magazine:  Historical Chronicle.  June ©1810. 

 *  Whiting was ground up chalk

Advertisement

Couere-feu, The Practice of Preserving Fire©

02 Wednesday Nov 2011

Posted by thehistoricfoodie in 18th century cooking, 18th century cookware, 18th century food, 19th century food, Colonial foods, historic food

≈ Leave a comment

couvre-feu, device for covering a fire

 

Fire was necessary for preparing meals, and in the days before matches were readily available having fire to cook with meant preserving the fire so that it never, or at least rarely, went out.    

The first fireplaces were merely holes in the center of the floor where a fire was built out in the open.  The smoke rose and, as best it could, exited through the roof which was usually thatch.  I find it fascinating that while my Scottish ancestors were building fires in this manner in the old country, my Native American ancestors were doing the same in North America.  Some technologies are so basic they evolve simultaneously between different cultures.

The second evolution in fire building was to move the fire up against a wall.  There was sometimes an overhang which helped catch some of the smoke and allow it to exit through a hole in the roof.  After several evolutions the fireplace as we know it emerged from that first central fire.

If there were any large burning logs they were pulled off to the sides and allowed to go out at night.  The hot coals that remained were raked up into a pile at the back of the fireplace, and a cover was placed over them.

The cover allowed just enough air to get in around it to keep the coals slowly smoldering throughout the night so that come morning a bit of dry wood could be put on and the fire would quickly roar to life ready for the day’s meals to be prepared. 

The cover was called by several names, a carre-feu, curre-feu (“cover the fire”), or later a couvre-feu, ignitegium or peritegium.  The word was later simply curfew.  The bells which signaled residents to cover their fires and prepare for bed was the curfew bell. 

Some hated the laws that governed the times the curfew bells were rung claiming they were put into effect to keep groups from gathering after dark. 

I see the law, as did most of the 19th century writers, as primarily a preventative measure in the days when whole cities could burn down from stray sparks going up and out of the chimney and igniting a wooden roof.  In villages where all the structures were wooden; and dry wood at that, if one house caught fire an entire village or section of a village often burned before it could be contained.  By ordering the fires covered at the hour most inhabitants went to bed all could sleep soundly without worry of being burned in their beds before morning. 

The hour the bell was rung was usually eight or nine o’clock in the evening. 

Such practice was documented to the time of William the Conqueror about 1068, and similar customs were observed simultaneously in France, Italy, Spain, Scotland and probably all or most of Europe.    

The covers were used in Colonial America.  Having hot coals in the morning with which to build the morning fire can only be appreciated by those who have had to arise on a cold morning and fumble around with building a fire when the fingers are so cold they will barely hold the materials.  The utensil was appreciated by those who used it for keeping coals hot during the night without using expensive fuel. 

It should be noted that everyone probably banked their fire at night.  Those without utensils to cover it simply raked ashes over the hot coals to seal out the air and keep the coals hot till morning.

The British Archaeological Association described one made of copper that was riveted together, solder being liable to melt.  It was 10 inches high, sixteen inches wide, and nine inches deep.  They also described one of earthenware with brown glazing on it housed in the Boulogne Museum.

That association pointed out that in some English books on antiquities the curfew had been erroneously described in saying its purpose was to quickly extinguish a fire when in fact it was the very opposite.  They described the utensils as being extremely rare in England by the 1820’s, many of England’s buildings being brick by that time which were much less likely to catch fire. 

In France, however, a traveler wrote in 1890 a published account of his trip through France of hearing a bell ringing and when he inquired as to its purpose was told it was the curfew bell, signifying that in some parts of Europe the custom continued long after it had ended in England.

In America, the custom of ringing the bell continued long after households stopped using the utensil to cover their fire.  Since the bell was rung at the same time every day, those who could not afford time pieces knew the time when they heard the bell ring. 

In closing, perhaps Henry Wadsworth Longfollow said it more poetically:

With the ringing of the curfew bell-

Cover the embers

And put out the light

Toil comes with the morning

And rest with the night.

 Blissful meals, yall.

Bibliography:

British Archaeological Association.  The Journal of the British Archaeological Association.  1849.  London.

Hone, William.  The Every Day Book.  1825.  London.

 Richard Bentley.  Wayfaring in France.  1890.  London.

 Webster, Hanson.  American Classics for Seventh and Eighth Grade Reading.  1905.  Boston.

Archives

  • August 2022 (2)
  • July 2022 (1)
  • April 2022 (1)
  • February 2022 (1)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • July 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • February 2019 (4)
  • January 2019 (1)
  • October 2018 (1)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (1)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (3)
  • April 2018 (2)
  • March 2018 (7)
  • February 2018 (1)
  • December 2017 (3)
  • November 2017 (1)
  • September 2017 (2)
  • June 2017 (1)
  • May 2017 (1)
  • March 2017 (1)
  • February 2017 (4)
  • January 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (2)
  • August 2016 (5)
  • July 2016 (2)
  • June 2016 (3)
  • May 2016 (7)
  • February 2016 (1)
  • January 2016 (8)
  • September 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (1)
  • February 2015 (3)
  • January 2015 (2)
  • December 2014 (1)
  • November 2014 (2)
  • October 2014 (3)
  • August 2014 (6)
  • July 2014 (8)
  • June 2014 (8)
  • May 2014 (11)
  • April 2014 (4)
  • March 2014 (5)
  • February 2014 (4)
  • January 2014 (4)
  • December 2013 (3)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (4)
  • September 2013 (8)
  • August 2013 (1)
  • July 2013 (10)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (3)
  • April 2013 (10)
  • March 2013 (4)
  • February 2013 (3)
  • January 2013 (13)
  • December 2012 (13)
  • November 2012 (4)
  • October 2012 (1)
  • August 2012 (3)
  • July 2012 (12)
  • June 2012 (5)
  • May 2012 (5)
  • April 2012 (4)
  • March 2012 (8)
  • February 2012 (1)
  • January 2012 (5)
  • December 2011 (10)
  • November 2011 (2)
  • October 2011 (3)
  • September 2011 (4)
  • August 2011 (7)
  • July 2011 (10)
  • June 2011 (6)
  • May 2011 (1)
  • March 2011 (1)
  • December 2010 (2)
  • November 2010 (2)
  • October 2010 (3)
  • December 2009 (1)
  • June 2009 (13)
  • May 2009 (10)
  • April 2009 (9)
  • March 2009 (1)

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 526 other subscribers

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Thehistoricfoodie's Blog
    • Join 478 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Thehistoricfoodie's Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.